Consensus Moderation


Consensus Moderation

Definition and Explanation of Terms

Read more at: Definition and Explanation of Terms.

Purpose of Consensus Moderation

The fundamental purpose of consensus moderation in assessment is to ensure appropriate and consistent quality of assessment and its outcomes. Read more at: Purpose of Consensus Moderation.

Supporting Consensus Moderation

A big step towards gaining agreement and achieving consensus in moderation of assessment is by using the principles for good assessment and best practice to guide you. Read more at: Supporting Consensus Moderation.

Peer Review Process

Consensus moderation of assessment is most commonly conducted via a peer review process, where the aim is to reach a shared understanding, or consensus about what constitutes quality. Read more at: Peer Review Process.

Self Review

As a sole convenor or sole marker, you are not exempt from the processes of consensus moderation. Read more at: Self Review.

Consensus Moderation Model

At Griffith, we apply consensus moderation across all levels of assessment practice to ensure assessments are fair, valid, reliable, consistent and comparable. Read more at: Consensus Moderation Model.

Consensus Moderation Case Studies

Read more at: Consensus Moderation Case Studies.

Top Practice Tips for Consensus Moderation

  1. Plan and factor in moderation time in your assessment activities
  2. Use primary evidence (samples of students' work, assignments, performances)
  3. Keep a repository of work for each course
  4. Document your moderation activities
  5. The peer review process is a collegial one
  6. As a sole convenor or marker, you must still engage in consensus moderation

Top Practice Tips for Consensus Moderation